LLM cognitive reasoning capabilities

AI LLMs and their reasoning potential

Type of Reasoning

Deductive Reasoning

The process of reasoning, whereby humans engage in mental operations to extract conclusions or solve problems, can be divided into two essential types. The first type, deductive reasoning, involves deriving specific conclusions from a general rule or principle.

For example, one might begin with the premise that "all dogs have ears" and "Chihuahuas are dogs," leading to the conclusion that "Chihuahuas have ears."

Inductive Reasoning

The Second common approach to reasoning is inductive reasoning, which involves creating general principles based on specific observations. For instance, one might conclude that all swans are white because every swan encountered so far has been white.

Reasoning in AI Systems

Current Research Focus

Numerous studies have focused on how humans apply deductive and inductive reasoning in their everyday activities. Yet, there is a notable lack of research into how these reasoning methods are implemented in artificial intelligence (AI) systems.

Recent Study by Amazon and UCLA

Researchers from Amazon and the University of California, Los Angeles have recently conducted a study into the fundamental reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). Their results, shared on the arXiv preprint server, indicate that while these models exhibit strong inductive reasoning abilities, their performance in deductive reasoning is often lacking.

Objectives of the Research

The paper aimed to elucidate the shortcomings in reasoning exhibited by Large Language Models (LLMs) and to explore the reasons behind their reduced performance on "counterfactual" reasoning tasks that diverge from conventional patterns.

Focus on Inductive vs. Deductive Reasoning

While various prior research efforts have focused on assessing the deductive reasoning skills of Large Language Models (LLMs) through basic instruction-following tasks, there has been limited scrutiny of their inductive reasoning abilities, which involve making generalizations from past data.

Introducing the SolverLearner Model

Development of SolverLearner

In order to distinctly separate inductive reasoning from deductive reasoning, the researchers introduced SolverLearner, a new model adopts a two-phase approach: one for learning rules and another for applying them to individual instances. Notably, the application of rules is carried out through external mechanisms, like code interpreters, to reduce dependence on the LLM's inherent deductive reasoning abilities, according to an Amazon spokesperson.

Application and Investigation

Using the SolverLearner framework they developed, the researchers at Amazon instructed Large Language Models (LLMs) to learn functions that link input data points to their corresponding outputs based on provided examples. This process facilitated an investigation into the models' ability to generalize rules from the examples.

Implications and Future Research

Findings and Applications

Researchers found that LLMs possess a stronger capability for inductive reasoning compared to deductive reasoning, notably in tasks involving "counterfactual" scenarios that stray from the usual framework. These findings can aid in the effective use of LLMs, such as by capitalizing on their inductive strengths when developing agent systems like chatbots.

Challenges in Deductive Reasoning

The researchers found that while LLMs demonstrated exceptional performance in inductive reasoning tasks, they often struggled with deductive reasoning. Particularly, their deductive reasoning was significantly impaired in situation based on hypothetical premises or that diverged from the norm.

Future Directions

The outcomes of this research could inspire AI developers to apply the notable inductive reasoning strengths of LLMs to specialized tasks. Additionally, they may open avenues for further exploration into how LLMs process reasoning.

Proposed Research Areas

An Amazon spokesperson proposed that upcoming research could explore the connection between an LLMs ability to compress information and its strong inductive reasoning capabilities. This exploration might contribute to further improvements in the model's inductive reasoning proficiency.

Source