Opinion: George Osborne's new podcast raises concern?

The entertainment industry often serves as a platform to revitalize public images, which explains why former politicians are eager to invest in this influential realm, perpetuating a speech bubble of grandeur.

Retirement seemed to have a diminishing effect on Alan Clark, the former junior minister of the Thatcher-era Conservative government. In his diaries, he passionately expressed his restlessness, an insatiable appetite for news and gossip, and harbored resentment towards John Major. He recognized the paradoxical allure of politics, wherein its inherent cruelty holds a certain fascination.

Had Alan Clark stayed in the political arena long enough to witness the rise of podcasts, he would undoubtedly have been a prominent host of his own politics-focused show. With a flair for storytelling, he would regale listeners with reminiscences, insider gossip, and unapologetic political commentary, creating a regular 50-minute audio experience. This engaging content, delving into the highs and lows of Westminster, would be generously sponsored by a reputable probiotic yogurt manufacturer.

The emergence of podcasts has given rise to a flourishing cottage industry in SW1, offering former ministers and pseudo-advisers a new avenue for employment. Notably, Alastair Campbell, known for his diaries, hosts The Rest is Politics alongside Rory Stewart, a highly acclaimed show that has even embarked on theater tours. Joining the ranks of this competitive landscape are George Osborne and Ed Balls, who are set to launch their own economics-focused podcast.

A distinct format has rapidly emerged in the podcasting landscape, featuring two prominent figures, often male, who skillfully blend current events with exclusive insider insights, ranging from observations of world leaders' body language to nuanced accounts of office dynamics. This format strikes a delicate balance between being well-informed and approachable, as evidenced by a recent report from the Reuters Institute. The report highlights that this genre of podcasts attracts a discernibly distinct audience, comprising a younger, highly educated, and notably affluent demographic.

A fundamental aspect of this podcast format centers around the inclusion of notable figures who represent political viewpoints spanning no more than a two-inch divide. They are carefully chosen to avoid extremes on either end of the ideological spectrum. Embracing the essence of civil discourse, these individuals engage in constructive debates while maintaining a genial rapport. George Osborne's recent characterization of Ed Balls as a former "bitter foe" who has now become a "firm friend" exemplifies the congeniality that characterizes this format.

As I read those words, a vivid recollection resurfaced, taking me back to an encounter seven years ago. It was a spring day in 2016 when I found myself seated in a modest front room of a tightly packed terrace house. Facing me were Paul and Lisa Chapman, and the narrative they shared, with all its distressing banality, offered a poignant illustration of the deep-rooted challenges within the realm of British politics.

For many years, Paul and Lisa had been an integral part of the community in Irthlingborough, a town nestled in Northamptonshire. Their lives were upended when Paul began experiencing a series of debilitating symptoms, including tremors, shakes, and sudden falls. It was then that he received the diagnosis of Parkinson's disease, a condition that rendered his once agile body unresponsive to the commands of his determined mind. Lisa, in a remarkable display of devotion, made the difficult decision to relinquish her cleaning job to provide the necessary care. As a result, the couple became reliant on social security for support. However, with the passage of time and the implementation of Osborne's austerity measures, their sense of security was eroded. Research revealed that individuals with severe disabilities, like Paul, were disproportionately affected, experiencing the impact of spending cuts at a rate 19 times more severe than the average population.

The Chapmans found themselves entangled in an assessment process that failed to accurately reflect Paul's true health condition, ultimately depriving them of the rightful benefits they deserved. As I sat with them, Paul recounted the harrowing moment when he uttered the desperate words to Lisa: "You go to your mother's place. I'll disappear, forsaking my medications and insulin. Then, it will all come to an end. I won't be here anymore."

Even to this day, I vividly recall the tone of confusion in his voice—the unexpected illness, the shattered hopes for a fulfilling life, and the sense of bureaucratic cruelty that seemed unimaginable.

When George Osborne assumes the role of an esteemed commentator, he rarely encounters questions about individuals such as the Chapmans or the compelling scientific research indicating that his austerity program resulted in approximately 300,000 excess deaths. I do not anticipate that these matters will occupy a significant portion of his podcast, particularly given Ed Balls' previous alignment with substantial aspects of the austerity agenda. Instead, the focus is more likely to be on playful jabs at the former chancellor's post-Westminster endeavors. How many professional pursuits has he embarked upon thus far?

In 2003, Campbell played a pivotal role in promoting a war based on contested evidence, resulting in the loss of an estimated 280,000 to 315,000 Iraqi lives, as reported by Brown University. On the 20th anniversary of the commencement of the Iraq war, his podcast featured an interviewee not from the bereaved families, the injured soldiers, or the million Britons who protested against the war, but rather Stewart, who later assumed a post-invasion role akin to a modern-day colonial administrator in the war-ravaged nation. It is noteworthy that their conversation on this matter exhibited less intensity than their discussions on the complexities of Brexit.

The realm of light entertainment has emerged as a powerful tool for the refurbishment of political reputations. In recent years, television quiz shows served to present Boris Johnson as a charismatic figure, even in the face of his well-documented propensity for falsehoods. Similarly, culinary exploits and dance floor mishaps propelled Ed Balls from the realm of economics to the status of a well-known public figure. The underlying narrative suggests a departure from the trappings of Westminster, as if these individuals have shed their political personas to embrace a more relatable civilian existence. However, it is worth noting that long after departing from Blair's inner circle, Campbell remained involved in electoral campaigns, while Osborne, in his capacity as editor of the London Evening Standard, influenced front-page narratives to support the political endeavors of his former chief of staff, Matt Hancock, who transitioned from that role to assume the responsibilities of the Secretary of State for Health.

In the current landscape, the burgeoning podcast industry, buoyed by substantial venture capital investments, has emerged as a powerful platform for political figures seeking redemption. It serves as an expansive medium through which seasoned politicos can revitalize their public image. In this context, it remains to be seen whether the public will develop a newfound appreciation for George Osborne, a figure who, in my personal observation, possesses a considerable degree of affability compared to the misguided perceptions associated with David Cameron, a representative of the affluent Sloane milieu.

Several months after I shared the account of the Chapman's ordeal, the Brexit referendum ensued, prompting a newfound inclination among political circles to listen to the voices of voters and engage with arguments that had long been dismissed. However, in the wake of the Brexit outcome, the transition from Corbynism to Johnson's premiership, that era has run its course. Presently, we find ourselves amidst a prevailing climate of lukewarm liberalism, marked by comfortable agreement and a deliberate oversight of those unsettling facts and marginalized individuals who do not neatly align with prevailing narratives. Yet, it is imperative to recognize that these issues remain unresolved and warrant sustained attention.

In a recent conversation with the Chapman's, it became apparent that Paul's condition, Parkinson's disease, has significantly deteriorated, placing increased strain on their financial situation. The current level of benefits they receive fails to adequately cover the rising costs of essential necessities such as food and fuel. During the previous winter, they resorted to forgoing central heating, with Lisa seeking respite at her mother's home for a few hours each day. Paul suffered a broken finger in December, but due to the numbing effects of the cold, he only experienced the pain in February. To manage their financial challenges, they have resorted to borrowing from relatives and initiating the sale of personal possessions, including Paul's model cars and fish tank, as well as Lisa's collection of CDs and DVDs. Regrettably, their next step involves considering the sale of their cherished terrace house.

Lisa expressed, "We diligently followed the right path, both of us working hard to attain our own property." When assigning responsibility, she pointed a finger at "those in Westminster, who have proven themselves to be untruthful." Paul, reflecting on Osborne's recent endeavors, remarked, "All those appointments seem like accolades for him, positioning him at the pinnacle." In light of this, what did he and Lisa feel? "Oh, we find ourselves at the lowest rung of the ladder."

Having already borne witness to the harshness of politics, the Chapman's possess valuable insights that could be shared through a podcast, offering an opportunity for others to learn from their experiences.

Source