Skip to main content

artificial-general-intelligence-experts-development-claims

Artificial General Intelligence: Experts Warn Against Overestimating Development Potential

The Current Hype Surrounding AI

Claims of Inevitable Advancement

AI surpassing the human brain is deemed inevitable by employees at OpenAI, Google DeepMind and similar tech companies. However, researchers from Radboud University and other institutions have released new findings, now published in Computational Brain & Behavior, showing that claims are exaggerated and unlikely to materialize.

Expert Insights on AGI Development

The Impossibility of Human-Level Cognition

Iris van Rooij, lead author and professor of Computational Cognitive Science at Radboud University, asserts that developing artificial general intelligence (AGI) with human-level cognition is "Impossible." As head of the Cognitive Science and AI department, she leads this critical analysis.

Theoretical vs. Practical Feasibility

"While some contend that AGI is achievable in theory, arguing that it's just a matter of time before computers can think like humans, theory alone isn't sufficient to make it a reality. Our paper illustrates why pursuing this goal is misguided and a waste of valuable resources," explains van Rooij.

Endless Possibilities Powered by Finite Capabilities

A Thought Experiment on Ideal Conditions

In their publication, the researchers propose a thought experiment that envisions the development of AGI under perfect conditions.

Limitations Even Under Optimal Conditions

Olivia Guest, co-author and assistant professor at Radboud University in Computational Cognitive Science, remarks, "For the sake of argument, we propose that engineers have access to perfect datasets and the most efficient machine learning tools. But despite these advantages, no viable method exists to deliver what big tech companies claim."

The Challenge of Replicating Human Cognition

This is due to the fact that cognition--the capacity to observe, learn, and acquire new insights--is extremely challenging to replicate in AI at the scale seen in the human brain.

As van Rooij explains, "In conversation, you might recall a statement from fifteen minutes ago, a year ago, or even a distant memory from your childhood. Such knowledge could be vital in moving the conversation forward, and people do this naturally."

"There will never be enough computational capacity to develop AGI using machine learning, as we would deplete our natural resources long before reaching that level of advancement," adds Olivia Guest.

The Importance of Critical AI Literacy

A Collaborative Effort Across Disciplines

This paper represents a collaborative effort among researchers from Radboud University, Aarhus University, The University of Amsterdam, Memorial University of Newfoundland, and the University of Bayreuth, integrating insights from Cognitive Science, Neuroscience, Philosophy, and Computer Science.

Risks of Misunderstanding AI Capabilities

The researchers caution that the current enthusiasm for AI poses a risk of misapprehending the capabilities of both humans and AI systems.

Evaluating AI Claims Through Cognitive Science

It is surprising how few recognize the importance of cognitive science in evaluating assertions about AI capabilities. "We tend to exaggerate what computers can do, while greatly undervaluing the capabilities of human cognition," explains van Rooij.

Fostering a Deeper Understanding of AI

Developing critical AI literacy is essential to empower individuals with the ability to discern the viability of assertions made by large tech corporations. If a new firm claims to have invented a device that can bring about world peace with a mere button press, it would be prudent to question that claim.

"Why do we readily accept the assurances of large tech companies motivated by profit? Our aim is to foster a deeper understanding of AI systems, enabling everyone to critically assess the claims made by the technology sector."

Source

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NASA chile scientists comet 3i atlas nickel mystery

NASA and Chilean Scientists Study 3I/ATLAS, A Comet That Breaks the Rules Interstellar visitors are rare guests in our Solar System , but when they appear they often rewrite the rules of astronomy. Such is the case with 3I/ATLAS , a fast-moving object that has left scientists puzzled with its bizarre behaviour. Recent findings from NASA and Chilean researchers reveal that this comet-like body is expelling an unusual plume of nickel — without the iron that typically accompanies it. The discovery challenges conventional wisdom about how comets form and evolve, sparking both excitement and controversy across the scientific community. A Cosmic Outsider: What Is 3I/ATLAS? The object 3I/ATLAS —the third known interstellar traveler after "Oumuamua (2017) and 2I/Borisov (2019) —was first detected in July 2025 by the ATLAS telescope network , which scans he skies for potentially hazardous objects. Earlier images from Chile's Vera C. Rubin Observatory had unknowingly captured it, but ...

Quantum neural algorithms for creating illusions

Quantum Neural Networks and Optical Illusions: A New Era for AI? Introduction At first glance, optical illusions, quantum mechanics, and neural networks may appear unrelated. However, my recent research in APL Machine Learning Leverages "quantum tunneling" to create a neural network that perceives optical illusions similarly to humans. Neural Network Performance The neural network I developed successfully replicated human perception of the Necker cube and Rubin's vase illusions, surpassing the performance of several larger, conventional neural networks in computer vision tasks. This study may offer new perspectives on the potential for AI systems to approximate human cognitive processes. Why Focus on Optical Illusions? Understanding Visual Perception O ptical illusions mani pulate our visual  perce ption,  presenting scenarios that may or may not align with reality. Investigating these illusions  provides valuable understanding of brain function and dysfunction, inc...

fractal universe cosmic structure mandelbrot

Is the Universe a Fractal? Unraveling the Patterns of Nature The Cosmic Debate: Is the Universe a Fractal? For decades, cosmologists have debated whether the universe's large-scale structure exhibits fractal characteristics — appearing identical across scales. The answer is nuanced: not entirely, but in certain res pects, yes. It's a com plex matter. The Vast Universe and Its Hierarchical Structure Our universe is incredibly vast, com prising a p proximately 2 trillion galaxies. These galaxies are not distributed randomly but are organized into hierarchical structures. Small grou ps ty pically consist of u p to a dozen galaxies. Larger clusters contain thousands, while immense su perclusters extend for millions of light-years, forming intricate cosmic  patterns. Is this where the story comes to an end? Benoit Mandelbrot and the Introduction of Fractals During the mid-20th century, Benoit Mandelbrot introduced fractals to a wider audience . While he did not invent the conce pt —...